<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attacking genuine evil in the blogosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/</link>
	<description>Welcome to the counterjihad!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haters and spammers and trolls, oh my! &#8212; 1389 Blog - Antijihadist Tech</title>
		<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-4103</link>
		<dc:creator>Haters and spammers and trolls, oh my! &#8212; 1389 Blog - Antijihadist Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-4103</guid>
		<description>[...] Attacking genuine evil in the blogosphere [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Attacking genuine evil in the blogosphere [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1389</title>
		<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-3205</link>
		<dc:creator>1389</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-3205</guid>
		<description>See &lt;a href=&quot;http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2007/12/suggested-corrections-for-charles.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GOV: Suggested Corrections for Charles Johnson&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See <a href="http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2007/12/suggested-corrections-for-charles.html">GOV: Suggested Corrections for Charles Johnson</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1389</title>
		<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2940</link>
		<dc:creator>1389</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2940</guid>
		<description>It seems that this particular article has not escaped notice on LGF. As one might expect, the commenters on LGF lacked the reading comprehension to understand anything I was saying in this blog post, and they came up with some truly stupid accusations. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gulfcoastpundit.com/index.php?/forums/viewthread/6969/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My answer to those accusations is posted on GCP Forums&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In case anybody can&#039;t figure it out:
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1389 Blog is a team blog. There are several blog authors and admins, including both men and women.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1389 is the founder and primary admin. 1389 is a female.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Articles authored by someone other than 1389 will be identified as such. Look for a byline, a category tag identifying the author, or an external link to the source of the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that this particular article has not escaped notice on LGF. As one might expect, the commenters on LGF lacked the reading comprehension to understand anything I was saying in this blog post, and they came up with some truly stupid accusations. <a href="http://www.gulfcoastpundit.com/index.php?/forums/viewthread/6969/">My answer to those accusations is posted on GCP Forums</a>.</p>
<p>In case anybody can&#8217;t figure it out:</p>
<p>1389 Blog is a team blog. There are several blog authors and admins, including both men and women.</p>
<p>1389 is the founder and primary admin. 1389 is a female.</p>
<p>Articles authored by someone other than 1389 will be identified as such. Look for a byline, a category tag identifying the author, or an external link to the source of the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thx1138</title>
		<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2907</link>
		<dc:creator>thx1138</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 06:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2907</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t ever really considered LGF a leader in the anti jihad movement nor wanting to be. Reader for 4 years. An important contributor in the blog world: yes. A blog that has grown large and no longer tolerates eccentric or embarassing dissension: yes.  Banning Ed seemed to be a poor thing to do. A lack of depth of confidence in the blog. Ed seemed pretty well reasoned to me and I only saw a couple of his GCP posts but they seemed pretty benign and somewhat supportive of Charles. 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I think you&#039;ll eventually see TFK, Dead Sea Squirrel there also leave or be booted. But if you look at old LGF threads, you would notice there is a huge turnover in people. Only a very small percentage stay on. I think that is true of all blogs. Membership and viewership are very dynamic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

I do think a lot of the people that leave LGF are the ones that are moving to more hands on activity in anti-jihadism. LGF is just a large starting area that is easy for people to find and eventually they move on and into more intense anti-jihadism that LGF can&#039;t politically support. So bannees should somewhat consider it a metamorphisis that they have moved on into other productive areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

The LGF ribbon is like a good conduct medal. Good to have but it not a sharpshooter notation. Adv. Training is needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t ever really considered LGF a leader in the anti jihad movement nor wanting to be. Reader for 4 years. An important contributor in the blog world: yes. A blog that has grown large and no longer tolerates eccentric or embarassing dissension: yes.  Banning Ed seemed to be a poor thing to do. A lack of depth of confidence in the blog. Ed seemed pretty well reasoned to me and I only saw a couple of his GCP posts but they seemed pretty benign and somewhat supportive of Charles. </p>
<p>I think you&#8217;ll eventually see TFK, Dead Sea Squirrel there also leave or be booted. But if you look at old LGF threads, you would notice there is a huge turnover in people. Only a very small percentage stay on. I think that is true of all blogs. Membership and viewership are very dynamic.</p>
<p>I do think a lot of the people that leave LGF are the ones that are moving to more hands on activity in anti-jihadism. LGF is just a large starting area that is easy for people to find and eventually they move on and into more intense anti-jihadism that LGF can&#8217;t politically support. So bannees should somewhat consider it a metamorphisis that they have moved on into other productive areas.</p>
<p>The LGF ribbon is like a good conduct medal. Good to have but it not a sharpshooter notation. Adv. Training is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1389</title>
		<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2898</link>
		<dc:creator>1389</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 01:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2898</guid>
		<description>Point well taken about most of the members of LGF over the years not deserving any blame for what has happened.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Let me make it clear that, when I refer to CJ&#039;s stooges, I mean those who are who are actively helping our jihadist enemies by posting false allegations, attacking and defaming good people in the counterjihadist community, and spewing racist blood-libel against the Serbian people. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

That said, CJ has always run LGF in a manner that prevents it from being effective in the counterjihad. At best, it has squandered the precious time and energy of many capable activists, myself included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point well taken about most of the members of LGF over the years not deserving any blame for what has happened.</p>
<p>Let me make it clear that, when I refer to CJ&#8217;s stooges, I mean those who are who are actively helping our jihadist enemies by posting false allegations, attacking and defaming good people in the counterjihadist community, and spewing racist blood-libel against the Serbian people. </p>
<p>That said, CJ has always run LGF in a manner that prevents it from being effective in the counterjihad. At best, it has squandered the precious time and energy of many capable activists, myself included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goodbye Natalie</title>
		<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2894</link>
		<dc:creator>Goodbye Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2894</guid>
		<description>Ms. 1389,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

I did not like the way many of LGF&#039;s European contributors were marginalized on the LGF board the last two months.  Some had contributed a great deal in the time I was there and deserved to be heard without punishment, threat or piling on. 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And while I can&#039;t disagree with your opinion about Charlie Johnson nor will I defend him because I think he is a pompous ass, this post paints a less than accurate picture of LGF when the board is considered in its entirety.  After leaving almost 11,000 posts there over a three year period before being banned, I feel like I know many of the regular posters pretty well.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Don&#039;t be fooled into believing that everyone that posts at LGF are Charles&#039; groupies - most aren&#039;t.  I know some personally that do not necessarily agree with all that is Charles and certainly don&#039;t care for the sycophants that have too often come to dominate the LGF board.  Over the last year, because of Charles&#039; foibles, thin skin and penchant for blocking anyone that questions his moral authority, understand there is some hesitation from some really fine people to criticize.  Most at LGF enjoy sharing information with other members of the board pertaining to a variety of subjects and they have established close relationships over the years.  Some have chosen to walk the line in order to remain there and maintain their membership; some not and have moved on to establish their own blogs.  Many of the current LGF regulars do yeoman&#039;s work in the good fight that goes unmentioned or unnoticed by Charles Johnson.  There are several Vets, some who are active, and they have sacrificed much in protecting western culture.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I personally admit a great degree of ignorance when it comes to either the situation in Serbia or Vlaams Belang and have chosen to remain silent.  America has enough troubles of its own to contend with and that is were I have chosen to carry my own fight without comment to that which you referenced above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. 1389,</p>
<p>I did not like the way many of LGF&#8217;s European contributors were marginalized on the LGF board the last two months.  Some had contributed a great deal in the time I was there and deserved to be heard without punishment, threat or piling on. </p>
<p>And while I can&#8217;t disagree with your opinion about Charlie Johnson nor will I defend him because I think he is a pompous ass, this post paints a less than accurate picture of LGF when the board is considered in its entirety.  After leaving almost 11,000 posts there over a three year period before being banned, I feel like I know many of the regular posters pretty well.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be fooled into believing that everyone that posts at LGF are Charles&#8217; groupies &#8211; most aren&#8217;t.  I know some personally that do not necessarily agree with all that is Charles and certainly don&#8217;t care for the sycophants that have too often come to dominate the LGF board.  Over the last year, because of Charles&#8217; foibles, thin skin and penchant for blocking anyone that questions his moral authority, understand there is some hesitation from some really fine people to criticize.  Most at LGF enjoy sharing information with other members of the board pertaining to a variety of subjects and they have established close relationships over the years.  Some have chosen to walk the line in order to remain there and maintain their membership; some not and have moved on to establish their own blogs.  Many of the current LGF regulars do yeoman&#8217;s work in the good fight that goes unmentioned or unnoticed by Charles Johnson.  There are several Vets, some who are active, and they have sacrificed much in protecting western culture.</p>
<p>I personally admit a great degree of ignorance when it comes to either the situation in Serbia or Vlaams Belang and have chosen to remain silent.  America has enough troubles of its own to contend with and that is were I have chosen to carry my own fight without comment to that which you referenced above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foehammer</title>
		<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2885</link>
		<dc:creator>Foehammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 21:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2885</guid>
		<description>Give &#039;em Hell, 1389!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give &#8216;em Hell, 1389!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1389</title>
		<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2879</link>
		<dc:creator>1389</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2879</guid>
		<description>Baron, you are correct. I will keep that in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baron, you are correct. I will keep that in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baron Bodissey</title>
		<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-2868</link>
		<dc:creator>Baron Bodissey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1389blog.com/2007/12/07/attacking-genuine-evil-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2868</guid>
		<description>Just to be completely accurate -- an authentic hangman&#039;s noose has 13 turns or loops around the vertical before the not is tightened. Look it up.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be completely accurate &#8212; an authentic hangman&#8217;s noose has 13 turns or loops around the vertical before the not is tightened. Look it up.  <img src='http://1389blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

