<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg&#8217;s Changes Are A Bust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1389blog.com/2007/10/07/diggs-changes-are-a-bust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/10/07/diggs-changes-are-a-bust/</link>
	<description>Welcome to the counterjihad!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Digg up for sale - if it is, why should anyone buy it?</title>
		<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/10/07/diggs-changes-are-a-bust/comment-page-1/#comment-3991</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Digg up for sale - if it is, why should anyone buy it?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 06:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1389blog.com/2007/10/07/diggs-changes-are-a-bust-2/#comment-3991</guid>
		<description>[...] Digg user Tamar Weinberg liked Digg&#8217;s new features, but as we pointed out, the changes failed to provide the hoped-for boom in viewership. There were some irritating glitches; for instance, the new &#8220;Shout All&#8221; feature [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digg user Tamar Weinberg liked Digg&#8217;s new features, but as we pointed out, the changes failed to provide the hoped-for boom in viewership. There were some irritating glitches; for instance, the new &#8220;Shout All&#8221; feature [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Digg up for sale - if it is, why should anyone buy it? &#8212; 1389 Blog - Antijihadist Tech</title>
		<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/10/07/diggs-changes-are-a-bust/comment-page-1/#comment-3989</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Digg up for sale - if it is, why should anyone buy it? &#8212; 1389 Blog - Antijihadist Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 06:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1389blog.com/2007/10/07/diggs-changes-are-a-bust-2/#comment-3989</guid>
		<description>[...] Digg user Tamar Weinberg liked Digg&#8217;s new features, but as we pointed out, the changes failed to provide the hoped-for boom in viewership. There were some irritating glitches; for instance, the new &#8220;Shout All&#8221; feature [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digg user Tamar Weinberg liked Digg&#8217;s new features, but as we pointed out, the changes failed to provide the hoped-for boom in viewership. There were some irritating glitches; for instance, the new &#8220;Shout All&#8221; feature [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foehammer</title>
		<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/10/07/diggs-changes-are-a-bust/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Foehammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1389blog.com/2007/10/07/diggs-changes-are-a-bust-2/#comment-433</guid>
		<description>I do not miss Digg at all.  Why would anyone support thought-policing organizations like Digg?  They willfully give into the hordes of mediocre and fascist thinkers that strive to put down individual ideas.  Great ideas often come from individualism and not the group dynamic and that is why Digg allowing the Bury system is an absolute joke that is now coming to bite them in the ass.

Good riddance to Digg, I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not miss Digg at all.  Why would anyone support thought-policing organizations like Digg?  They willfully give into the hordes of mediocre and fascist thinkers that strive to put down individual ideas.  Great ideas often come from individualism and not the group dynamic and that is why Digg allowing the Bury system is an absolute joke that is now coming to bite them in the ass.</p>
<p>Good riddance to Digg, I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Badera</title>
		<link>http://1389blog.com/2007/10/07/diggs-changes-are-a-bust/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Badera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1389blog.com/2007/10/07/diggs-changes-are-a-bust-2/#comment-432</guid>
		<description>Sweet, sweet truthiness.

I&#039;ve been on digg far less than I was for the first year or so after I registered.

Change is slow to come, and often poorly implemented, while ignoring, as you&#039;ve noted, obvious or underlying flaws.

The recent changes -- especially shouts -- are pretty annoying. And the external profile linking, to me, seems a last gasp effort at becoming a true social media hub -- which digg could have, and SHOULD have, become a year+ ago. Now they&#039;re playing catchup, and I, for one, am not feeling it.

digg? dugg!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet, sweet truthiness.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been on digg far less than I was for the first year or so after I registered.</p>
<p>Change is slow to come, and often poorly implemented, while ignoring, as you&#8217;ve noted, obvious or underlying flaws.</p>
<p>The recent changes &#8212; especially shouts &#8212; are pretty annoying. And the external profile linking, to me, seems a last gasp effort at becoming a true social media hub &#8212; which digg could have, and SHOULD have, become a year+ ago. Now they&#8217;re playing catchup, and I, for one, am not feeling it.</p>
<p>digg? dugg!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

