Comments on: I defy anybody to prove that Jihad Watch is “Violence/Hate/Racism”! http://1389blog.com/2007/09/07/i-defy-anybody-to-prove-that-jihad-watch-is-violencehateracism/ Welcome to the counterjihad! Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:55:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Objective http://1389blog.com/2007/09/07/i-defy-anybody-to-prove-that-jihad-watch-is-violencehateracism/comment-page-1/#comment-6986 Objective Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:50:37 +0000 http://1389blog.com/2007/09/07/i-defy-anybody-to-prove-that-jihad-watch-is-violencehateracism/#comment-6986 JihadWatch is extremely xenophobic. All it's quotations are interpreted as the terrorist understand them. This further enhances that JihadWatch is "narrow" minded. Example: Prophet mohammed married khadija when she was young... Do you guys know as "non-muslims" what marriage is in Islam?! It's not the sex and physical limitations Westerners have made it to be. This act is rare and symbolic in marriage life, as it results in "children", oh the countless orphans in the "western countries". He didn't touch her until she came of age. Its true that many many! things are happening in the Muslim world that are unacceptable by Islamic standards but don't mix the religion and the people claiming to practice it! JihadWatch is extremely xenophobic. All it’s quotations are interpreted as the terrorist understand them. This further enhances that JihadWatch is “narrow” minded.

Example:

Prophet mohammed married khadija when she was young…
Do you guys know as “non-muslims” what marriage is in Islam?! It’s not the sex and physical limitations Westerners have made it to be. This act is rare and symbolic in marriage life, as it results in “children”, oh the countless orphans in the “western countries”. He didn’t touch her until she came of age.

Its true that many many! things are happening in the Muslim world that are unacceptable by Islamic standards but don’t mix the religion and the people claiming to practice it!

]]> By: Badtux http://1389blog.com/2007/09/07/i-defy-anybody-to-prove-that-jihad-watch-is-violencehateracism/comment-page-1/#comment-6731 Badtux Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:39:37 +0000 http://1389blog.com/2007/09/07/i-defy-anybody-to-prove-that-jihad-watch-is-violencehateracism/#comment-6731 Why you're absolutely correct -- if I linked to a site called "JewWatch" that details the crimes of Jews, posting any news story anywhere that shows a Jew committing a crime, I guess according to your logic I'm not linking to a racist site. Heil! And I suppose a site called NegroWatch wouldn't be racist either, because after all, those darkies did commit all those crimes, all NegroWatch is doing is collecting the news reports all in one place. Nosiree, no racism there, no sir . And a site that posts only news stories that show Muslims committing a crime is somehow different than linking to a site that details the crimes of Jews or blacks because, well, just because. Alrighty, then! Glad you cleared that up! <em>Badtux, I am perfectly aware that there are good and bad people everywhere, and that it's easy enough to find evildoers in any part of the world, including the blogosphere. But that is NOT what we are talking about here! There is a good reason why the other site is called "JIHAD Watch" and not "Muslim Watch." This distinction is important, because the site publicizes wrongdoing perpetrated on behalf of Islamist expansionism in general and jihad in particular, not ordinary, run-of-the-mill criminal offenses that happen to have been committed by Muslims. - Blog Admin 1389</em> Why you’re absolutely correct — if I linked to a site called “JewWatch” that details the crimes of Jews, posting any news story anywhere that shows a Jew committing a crime, I guess according to your logic I’m not linking to a racist site. Heil! And I suppose a site called NegroWatch wouldn’t be racist either, because after all, those darkies did commit all those crimes, all NegroWatch is doing is collecting the news reports all in one place. Nosiree, no racism there, no sir . And a site that posts only news stories that show Muslims committing a crime is somehow different than linking to a site that details the crimes of Jews or blacks because, well, just because. Alrighty, then! Glad you cleared that up!

Badtux, I am perfectly aware that there are good and bad people everywhere, and that it’s easy enough to find evildoers in any part of the world, including the blogosphere. But that is NOT what we are talking about here! There is a good reason why the other site is called “JIHAD Watch” and not “Muslim Watch.” This distinction is important, because the site publicizes wrongdoing perpetrated on behalf of Islamist expansionism in general and jihad in particular, not ordinary, run-of-the-mill criminal offenses that happen to have been committed by Muslims.

- Blog Admin 1389

]]> By: 1389 http://1389blog.com/2007/09/07/i-defy-anybody-to-prove-that-jihad-watch-is-violencehateracism/comment-page-1/#comment-225 1389 Sun, 09 Sep 2007 05:51:41 +0000 http://1389blog.com/2007/09/07/i-defy-anybody-to-prove-that-jihad-watch-is-violencehateracism/#comment-225 <p>PP, "xenophobic" is an inaccurate and insulting description of Jihad Watch. Had you been reading that blog for any length of time, you would have known that Jihad Watch reports news items about jihadist activities. Robert Spencer is a brave man and it is an unwarranted insult for you to call him "phobic" about anything. </p><p> </p> <p>Moreover, "xenophobia" means "fear of strangers" - based on ignorance - while Robert Spencer's statements about Islam, its doctrines, and its adherents, are based on his comprehensive knowledge of those topics.</p><p> </p> <p>But that's not the point. The point is that, whether you agree with it or not, this is political speech. In what is supposedly a free society, there is no justification for censoring it.</p><p> </p><p>If you still don't understand, read this: <a href="http://foehammer.net/2007/08/islamophobia-vs-islamomisia-islamotedium.html" rel="nofollow">Islamophobia vs. Islamomisia - Islamotedium</a> PP, “xenophobic” is an inaccurate and insulting description of Jihad Watch. Had you been reading that blog for any length of time, you would have known that Jihad Watch reports news items about jihadist activities. Robert Spencer is a brave man and it is an unwarranted insult for you to call him “phobic” about anything.

 

Moreover, “xenophobia” means “fear of strangers” – based on ignorance – while Robert Spencer’s statements about Islam, its doctrines, and its adherents, are based on his comprehensive knowledge of those topics.

 

But that’s not the point. The point is that, whether you agree with it or not, this is political speech. In what is supposedly a free society, there is no justification for censoring it.

 

If you still don’t understand, read this: Islamophobia vs. Islamomisia – Islamotedium

]]> By: PP http://1389blog.com/2007/09/07/i-defy-anybody-to-prove-that-jihad-watch-is-violencehateracism/comment-page-1/#comment-208 PP Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:31:19 +0000 http://1389blog.com/2007/09/07/i-defy-anybody-to-prove-that-jihad-watch-is-violencehateracism/#comment-208 You can keep living in your world of good/evil, where "we" (westerners, christians) are, of course, good. However, if you want to live in reality, you must leave your xenophobia behind. For those who don't know: "As with all phobias, a xenophobic person is aware of the fear, and therefore has to believe at some level that the target is in fact a foreigner." (in Wikipedia) Maybe it shouldn't be rated as racism but, to my eyes, it is for sure xenophobic. You can keep living in your world of good/evil, where “we” (westerners, christians) are, of course, good. However, if you want to live in reality, you must leave your xenophobia behind. For those who don’t know:
“As with all phobias, a xenophobic person is aware of the fear, and therefore has to believe at some level that the target is in fact a foreigner.” (in Wikipedia) Maybe it shouldn’t be rated as racism but, to my eyes, it is for sure xenophobic.

]]> By: Lady Predator http://1389blog.com/2007/09/07/i-defy-anybody-to-prove-that-jihad-watch-is-violencehateracism/comment-page-1/#comment-207 Lady Predator Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:05:31 +0000 http://1389blog.com/2007/09/07/i-defy-anybody-to-prove-that-jihad-watch-is-violencehateracism/#comment-207 I got the same stupid remark for thereligionofpeace.com these guys are really just aiding and abetting fascists. You submitted the following rating request to SonicWALL CFS Support: Rate thereligionofpeace.com as "31.Web Communications" at 2007-09-02 12:25:00.340 The request has been reviewed and rated as: "1.Violence/Hate/Racism" at 2007-09-03 02:48:44.063 You should see this rating change reflected within 1 to 3 business days. Thank you for your request, SonicWALL CFS Support I got the same stupid remark for thereligionofpeace.com these guys are really just aiding and abetting fascists.

You submitted the following rating request to SonicWALL CFS Support:
Rate thereligionofpeace.com as “31.Web Communications” at 2007-09-02
12:25:00.340

The request has been reviewed and rated as:
“1.Violence/Hate/Racism” at 2007-09-03 02:48:44.063

You should see this rating change reflected within 1 to 3 business days.

Thank you for your request,
SonicWALL CFS Support

]]>